I am in the dualities again. I had a talk with Prof. Alt0unian and he scared the shit out of me. He says that he has inside information that NSF funding for quantum information science projects will cease. Like zip-o. Closing shop. Zero. According to him NSERC will soon follow suit and cut the juice of the quantum in Canada as well.
This is hard to imagine given the superstar team Waterloo has built and the relative importance of the Canadian researchers in the field as a whole. But I guess it could happen.
Now, obviously I wasn’t in QIT for the money so this shouldn’t change my outlook on life too much, but it made me think about the value of a PhD in quantum information science if the field is dead in 3 years. In other words the academic option for my future will be severely endangered if my entire field suddenly disappears.
So then I must think about the coding option as the general direction for my future. Can I be a programmer? Do I want to be a programmer? Isn’t it better to go into construction or engine repairs? Surely there is cool things to do with neural nets and the new web technologies but let’s face it — in the end of the road you are sitting in front of the computer all day long. The coding approach by itself (as in coding all day long for company X) is pretty crap. The things that could be acceptable though are coding for mad money and coding science. If I can get a company off the ground soon and get some cash flow I could be a tech entrepreneur, leverage my personal skills, wear a suit and have smart people working for me programming the ideas I come-up with. A small agile company. Coding science is cool because it will allow me to continue reading papers all day long and only once in a while will I have to sit in front of a computer and get my hands dirty.
The main conclusion I came to is that I should steer away from duality and bullshit. If continue to work on the “real stuff” in QIT and play with “real” programming I will be O.K. in the end. And who said I have to choose only one thing to do in life? So why choose the dualistic view of :this: or :that:. Why not have everything at the same time? (Just have to drink twice the coffee;)